Unit 11: Privacy

“What can we do to protect our privacy?”

Nothing. At least, not if you have already put your information on the Internet. Of course, there are preventative measures people can take to ensure their privacy, but many people do not know how, nor would they do it even if they did know how.

The amount of settings people would have to change on their computers would be overwhelming for just about anybody. People would also have to avoid typing personal information such as their name, phone number, address, social security number, etc. into their computer at all times. People would basically have to stop online shopping, online banking, and any social media or e-mail use completely. You never know who is going to hack you at any given moment.

You might think I’m being harsh, but it really is true. There are not enough regulations on the Internet to keep everyone safe. Hackers can get through the best of firewalls with ease. And even if legislation were to be passed, nobody can enforce it inside the U.S., let alone in other countries.

Hackers can steal your money, medical records, identity, credit history, and even those pictures of your dog that you uploaded to Facebook. Depending on the situation, they can even do it legally.

Information that they steal could lead to you having poor credit history, or worse, losing everything. People have lost their jobs because they have looked up inappropriate things on their workplace’s e-mail server.

My point in all this is: be careful about what you put on the Internet.

Advertisers and social media sites will continue to tell you that they are collecting your information just to “give you a better experience.” And that’s all well and good, but what happens when one of them sells that information to a hacker, or their facial recognition software leads to someone being able to steal your identity more easily?

Good luck, and stay safe out there in Internet-land.


Made in China

Local family recalls adoption process

Allen and April Strauch knew early in their marriage that they would not be able to have biological children. Without much hesitation, they decided that adoption was the way to go for them.

Although the Strauchs knew they would be adopting children, they weren’t sure where they should adopt from. Then, one morning at their church service, they recalled listening to Paul Hatmaker speak to the congregation. He was a spokesperson for Living Hope Adoption Agency.

Living Hope’s main adoption site at that time was in China. Shortly after they heard Hatmaker speak, the Strauchs were drawn to adopt from China. “China is by far the largest place for foreign adoptions,” said Allen.

At that time in the early 2000s, over 100,000 babies were abandoned each year in China. Children were abandoned frequently due to China’s one child policy. The Strauchs also remembered being told that only one in ten babies would survive in Chinese orphanages. That means at least 90,000 babies would die each year.

There were some minor drawbacks in the adoption process. April recalled that “Allen had to be 29 before we could start the paperwork, so we waited and called on his 29th birthday.” They also remember that the terrorist attacks in September 2001 happened only three months before they were supposed to pick up their first baby.

After the paperwork was finished, the Strauchs adopted two girls from China. Once in 2001 and again in 2005. Typically the adoption process takes around six years to complete each time, but it took them only two years each time from the beginning of the paperwork until they got to meet their little girls for the first time.

You Yi was adopted from the Hunan province in 2001 and renamed Lily Strauch, and Tong Min You was adopted from the Jaingxi province in 2005 and renamed Rayelle Strauch. They were both brought home shortly after their first birthdays.

The flight to China took about 14 hours each time. They flew from the U.S. to the city of Guangzhou, where the U.S. consulate is located.

Allen remembers that there were more time delays on their 2001 trip. “It took 37 hours from the time we left home until we made it to the hotel.” Also, when picking up Rayelle in 2005, they realized that she had pneumonia and they had to call a respiratory specialist to check on her at their hotel.

At first, the Strauchs were concerned about what people would think when they returned home. They live in a predominantly Caucasian area and didn’t know how people would react to white parents with Asian babies. Allen says, “I don’t know why, but when it came down to it, people were more accepting.”

The Strauch Family
(From left) Allen, April, Rayelle and Lily Strauch sit on the famous red adoption couch.


Lily is now 16 years old and Rayelle is 13 years old. When asked how being adopted has affected her, Lily said, “I never really thought about being Chinese until more recently… a lot of people aren’t as privileged to live in a community as accepting as ours.” The Strauchs are a normal American family with two Chinese-American daughters. April also said, “We were always open and talked to our girls about [adoption].” They wanted to make sure Lily and Rayelle felt comfortable asking questions and knew where they were from.

A few funny thoughts popped into their heads too. “I’m Chinese, but I can’t speak Chinese,” said Lily. “It just feels weird.” The family also recalled that when the girls were younger they got treated like royalty at Chinese restaurants. “I remember them giving us bags of candy to take home,” said Lily.

Lily admits that she is the sister who asks more questions. She has always been more curious, and Rayelle follows her lead. Lily is also interested in going back to China at least once. She wants to tour the place she once called home.

Unit 10: Online Course Review

Overall this semester, I have enjoyed taking Emergent Media in Mass Communications as an online course. I think it is important that emergent media and media literacy are interpreted for ourselves, and a lecture class would not have given the freedom to do that as much.

I also enjoy the fact that I can do all my assignments right when they are posted, or have the freedom to wait until the very last minute to finish everything (this happened more times than not).

I think the best part about this class for me was the textbook. I really loved the reading materials and W. James Potter wrote the easiest-to-read textbook I’ve ever studied with. And, if I struggled with focusing on the reading, I could read the PowerPoint slides and watch the instructional videos instead.

Blogging has been an interesting supplement to this online course. I have one other class where we use blogging as a medium for doing assignments. I don’t necessarily think I will keep up this blog after these classes are done. In fact, I will probably delete this blog. However it is nice to know how to use WordPress, because I’m sure I will probably need to know how to use it in the future. I do understand how a professional journalist could use a blog, but I don’t think it’s the way for me to go.

One thing I didn’t like about this course was that the online instructional videos were hard to view sometimes. I could watch about 10 seconds at a time, and it would buffer for another 10 in between. I know that it was due to my internet connection, but it was a big inconvenience. One other thing I would suggest is to space out the assignments more. Some weeks we only had a quiz and other weeks there were five to six assignments. It can be pretty hard to complete six assignments in one week, especially when that’s only one class, and I have four others.

Other than that, I enjoyed the course overall.

10/10 would recommend.

OJ Exercise 7

Russian robot programmed to fire pistols

A Russian robot named FEDOR is shown in a new video firing a pair of Glock pistols. Final Experimental Demonstration Object Research (FEDOR) has been programmed to accompany Russian Federation spaceships in the near future, and its programmers wanted to see how much the robot could do.

Russian robot FEDOR simulates what drilling will be like in space.

The robot is not yet able to make decisions on its own, however it fires the pistols with great accuracy.

Artificial Intelligence software has been rising in popularity, and Russia is on top of the game with FEDOR in its arsenal. Although the robot’s mission is to go to space, it has potential to do many other things as well.

Maybe Russia will have new law enforcement officers in the future. Hopefully FEDOR’s programmers can work out the kinks first.

Digital News Analysis

The following is my personal analysis and comparison of the writing styles of two articles regarding a newly proposed bill in North Carolina.

LA Times: “After transgender bathroom battle, North Carolina looks to ban same-sex marriage”


The LA Times covers this story by first mocking the state of North Carolina in the lead paragraph, and then goes into more depth, showing a new bill proposed by three Republican state legislators that would go against a Supreme Court ruling. The LA Times shows quotes from other legislators, republicans, democrats, and scholars. They also include some statistics and poll results outlining the support of same-sex marriage in the state. They compare it to the Supreme Court rulings against segregation in public schools, and how the rulings were challenged for years afterward.

This story also states that the bill is not likely to pass, and that it will not even be discussed at the next hearing.


Washington Post: “North Carolina bill banning same-sex marriage again won’t be heard, House speaker says”


The Washington Post article sticks to the facts of the bill. The article begins by saying that the bill is “dead on arrival,” letting the readers know that there is nothing to fear about this bill. The article then goes into more detail as to why the Supreme Court ruling will hold, and also goes into more detail about what the proposed bill contains.

After explaining what the proposed bill entails, the article takes a slight turn and goes on to discuss House Bill 2, the bill regarding transgender people using the bathroom of their choice, which was overturned recently.



The LA Times article was not necessarily opinionated, however any reader would be able to tell what stance the author was taking. The Washington Post article, however was very straightforward and very factual. By reading the Washington Post article, I would have no idea what the opinion of the author was. That is something that is important to me. I strive to write articles that are purely factual, especially when it comes to politics.

The use of quotes was also very different between the two stories. The Washington Post article had only a few direct quotes from two sources, and quoted the proposed bill twice, whereas the LA Times article was made up of about 50 percent quotes. Quotes are important, but the quotes in the LA Times article became almost unnecessary near the end.

The Washington Post article also used a few multimedia elements, such as photos, tweets and links, whereas the LA Times article only had one photo as the feature image.

In my opinion, the Washington Post article was written better than the LA Times article. The style of writing in the Washington Post article is what I would like to think my style of writing encompasses.

OJ Project: Sacramento Crime

In 2006, the Sacramento, California Police Department began keeping a running record of their arrests: when and where they happened, and the type of crime that was committed.

The record showed staggering amounts of crime for the month of January. In January 2006 alone, there were 7,584 arrests in the city of Sacramento.

In order to make this more manageable, I narrowed this data field down to the first 15 crimes committed on January 31. Those are the data points that are mapped below, coded by type of crime committed, and labeled by street address.